<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Agile Software Development Videos Directory &#187; coplien</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tvagile.com/tag/coplien/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tvagile.com</link>
	<description>Agile Software Development, Scrum, Extreme Programing, XP, Test Driven Development, TDD, Feature Driven Development, FDD, Lean, DSDM, Behavior Driven Development, BDD, Refactoring, Pair Programming, Kanban</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 11:41:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>The DCI Architecture: Lean and Agile at the Code Level</title>
		<link>http://www.tvagile.com/2010/08/30/the-dci-architecture-lean-and-agile-at-the-code-level/</link>
		<comments>http://www.tvagile.com/2010/08/30/the-dci-architecture-lean-and-agile-at-the-code-level/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2010 10:42:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Coding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[architecture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coplien]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lean]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tvagile.com/?p=2176</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[James Coplien explains the DCI (Data, Context, Interaction) paradigm used to better represent the user’s mental model in code through system state and behavior. Coplien makes an attempt to reintroduce architecture to Lean and Agile projects due to its value in sustaining high velocity and change resiliency. 
http://www.infoq.com/presentations/The-DCI-Architecture
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.tvagile.com/2010/08/30/the-dci-architecture-lean-and-agile-at-the-code-level/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Agile Fine-Tuning</title>
		<link>http://www.tvagile.com/2009/08/17/agile-fine-tuning/</link>
		<comments>http://www.tvagile.com/2009/08/17/agile-fine-tuning/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 08:57:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Project Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coplien]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scrum]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tvagile.com/?p=1489</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Recent work by James Coplien (the course instructor) with Scrum inventor Jeff Sutherland came to a radical conclusion: that though Scrum sounds very simple on the surface, it is in fact painfully intricate underneath (see http://jeffsutherland.com/scrum/2008/02/scrum-and-organizational-patterns.html). There is a well-understood incremental (agile!) path to making Scrum work. Understanding this path, and understanding your current practices, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.tvagile.com/2009/08/17/agile-fine-tuning/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Agile Architecture Is Not Fragile Architecture</title>
		<link>http://www.tvagile.com/2008/06/12/agile-architecture-is-not-fragile-architecture/</link>
		<comments>http://www.tvagile.com/2008/06/12/agile-architecture-is-not-fragile-architecture/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 14:35:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Agile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[architecture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coplien]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.softdevtube.com/?p=90</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Architecture is perceived as a heavy-weight activity which does not fit into an Agile process, so many teams start without it, just to find themselves re-doing the software later because the code structure was not good enough to support maintainability and evolution. In this presentation, Coplien and Henney describe how to start with enough architecture [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.tvagile.com/2008/06/12/agile-architecture-is-not-fragile-architecture/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Coplien and Martin Debate TDD, CDD and Professionalism</title>
		<link>http://www.tvagile.com/2008/02/29/coplien-and-martin-debate-tdd-cdd-and-professionalism/</link>
		<comments>http://www.tvagile.com/2008/02/29/coplien-and-martin-debate-tdd-cdd-and-professionalism/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 20:21:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Software Testing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coplien]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TDD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unit testing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.softdevtube.com/?p=16</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Debate sprang up at JAOO &#8216;07 around Bob Martin&#8217;s assertion that &#8220;nowadays it is irresponsible for a developer to ship a line of code he has not executed in a unit test.&#8221; In this InfoQ video, he debated with Jim Coplien on this and other topics, including Design by Contract vs. TDD and how much [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.tvagile.com/2008/02/29/coplien-and-martin-debate-tdd-cdd-and-professionalism/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
